Studying the Semantic Context of two Dutch Causal Connectives
نویسندگان
چکیده
We aim to study the difference of usage between two causal connectives in their semantic context. We present an ongoing study of two Dutch backward causal connectives omdat and want. Previous linguistic research has shown that causal constructions with want are more subjective and often express an opinion. Our hypothesis is that the left and right context surrounding the connectives are more semantically similar in sentences with omdat than sentences with want. To test this hypothesis we apply two techniques, Latent Semantic Analysis and n-gram overlap. We show that both methods indeed indicate a substantial difference between the two connectives but opposite to what we had expected.
منابع مشابه
On The Use Of Automatic Tools For Large-Scale Semantic Analyses Of Causal Connectives
In this paper we describe the (annotation) tools underlying two automatic techniques to analyse the meaning and use of backward causal connectives in large Dutch newspaper corpora. With the help of these techniques, Latent Semantic Analysis and Thematic Text Analysis, the contexts of more than 14,000 connectives were studied. We will focus here on the methods of analysis and on the fairly strai...
متن کاملAutomatic techniques to analyze connectives 1 Running head :
In this paper we explore the possibility of using automatic techniques to analyze the use of backward causal connectives in large Dutch newspaper corpora. With the help of two techniques, Latent Semantic Analysis and Thematic Text Analysis , the contexts of more than 14,000 connectives were studied. The method of analysis is described. It is found that differences that have been suggested in th...
متن کاملResponsible subjects and discourse causality. How mental spaces and perspective help identifying subjectivity in Dutch backward causal connectives
The Basic Communicative Spaces Network (BCSN – Sanders et al., 2009) accounts for crucial semantic–pragmatic characteristics of causal relations expressed by frequently used Dutch causal connectives. BCSN integrates subjectivity theory, domain theory, and mental spaces theory to explain their linguistic categorization. Starting with the original three-way classification of content, epistemic, a...
متن کاملThe role of prosody in distinguishing different backward causal coherence relations in spoken English
Without intonation, this causal relation might be interpreted in multiple ways. The speaker might reason, “There would be no parking either on one of those sides”. This conclusion is then based on the argument, “It’s street sweeping day, or something”. This causal relation is interpreted as such by the speaker herself. We can describe such a causal relation as relatively subjective (cf. e.g. Pa...
متن کاملContrasting causal connectives on the Speaker Involvement Scale
In our talk we would like to contrast Dutch and French causal connectives on the Speaker Involvement Scale (Degand & Pander Maat, to appear; Pander Maat & Degand, to appear). This scale is an alternative proposal to classify the use and meaning of connectives. Going beyond dichotomous and trichotomous classifications, we have proposed to represent (causal) coherence relations and connectives in...
متن کامل