Studying the Semantic Context of two Dutch Causal Connectives

نویسندگان

  • Iris Hendrickx
  • Wilbert Spooren
چکیده

We aim to study the difference of usage between two causal connectives in their semantic context. We present an ongoing study of two Dutch backward causal connectives omdat and want. Previous linguistic research has shown that causal constructions with want are more subjective and often express an opinion. Our hypothesis is that the left and right context surrounding the connectives are more semantically similar in sentences with omdat than sentences with want. To test this hypothesis we apply two techniques, Latent Semantic Analysis and n-gram overlap. We show that both methods indeed indicate a substantial difference between the two connectives but opposite to what we had expected.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

On The Use Of Automatic Tools For Large-Scale Semantic Analyses Of Causal Connectives

In this paper we describe the (annotation) tools underlying two automatic techniques to analyse the meaning and use of backward causal connectives in large Dutch newspaper corpora. With the help of these techniques, Latent Semantic Analysis and Thematic Text Analysis, the contexts of more than 14,000 connectives were studied. We will focus here on the methods of analysis and on the fairly strai...

متن کامل

Automatic techniques to analyze connectives 1 Running head :

In this paper we explore the possibility of using automatic techniques to analyze the use of backward causal connectives in large Dutch newspaper corpora. With the help of two techniques, Latent Semantic Analysis and Thematic Text Analysis , the contexts of more than 14,000 connectives were studied. The method of analysis is described. It is found that differences that have been suggested in th...

متن کامل

Responsible subjects and discourse causality. How mental spaces and perspective help identifying subjectivity in Dutch backward causal connectives

The Basic Communicative Spaces Network (BCSN – Sanders et al., 2009) accounts for crucial semantic–pragmatic characteristics of causal relations expressed by frequently used Dutch causal connectives. BCSN integrates subjectivity theory, domain theory, and mental spaces theory to explain their linguistic categorization. Starting with the original three-way classification of content, epistemic, a...

متن کامل

The role of prosody in distinguishing different backward causal coherence relations in spoken English

Without intonation, this causal relation might be interpreted in multiple ways. The speaker might reason, “There would be no parking either on one of those sides”. This conclusion is then based on the argument, “It’s street sweeping day, or something”. This causal relation is interpreted as such by the speaker herself. We can describe such a causal relation as relatively subjective (cf. e.g. Pa...

متن کامل

Contrasting causal connectives on the Speaker Involvement Scale

In our talk we would like to contrast Dutch and French causal connectives on the Speaker Involvement Scale (Degand & Pander Maat, to appear; Pander Maat & Degand, to appear). This scale is an alternative proposal to classify the use and meaning of connectives. Going beyond dichotomous and trichotomous classifications, we have proposed to represent (causal) coherence relations and connectives in...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2014